Most marketing teams are not short of data. They are short of the hours it takes to read it. We put agents on the reading — search and campaign data cleared continuously, opportunities surfaced, briefs and reports drafted. What arrives is a short list of decisions, not another dashboard. The judgement — what to publish, what to say, what to spend — stays with your team.
Runs on your accounts · every figure sourced · eval harness ships with every agent
Two sources, one agent, three briefs
Four things we do.
Your Search Console and Ads data read continuously rather than in a monthly panic. An agent surfaces the keywords you are half-ranking for, the pages losing ground, and the spend that is not returning — as a short list of things to decide, not a dashboard nobody opens.
Once an opportunity is agreed, the agent drafts the brief — angle, structure, the questions the piece has to answer. A writer takes it from there. The machine clears the analysis; the editorial judgement stays with a person.
The monthly report assembled from the source data, with the commentary drafted and the anomalies flagged. You review and sign, instead of rebuilding the same deck every month.
The unglamorous connective work — leads routed, enquiries triaged and answered from a first draft, quotes issued, the CRM kept honest. Marketing that stops leaking at the handover to sales.
A working agent in the first week.
We look at what you already collect — analytics, ad accounts, CRM — and what decisions you actually need to make from it. You approve a one-page plan before anything is built.
A working agent in the first week, running against your real data. Then we tighten it against the cases it gets wrong, until the output is trustworthy enough to act on.
It runs in your accounts, on your keys, with a test suite and documentation. Your team operates it. We are not a dependency.
What recent projects look like.
- 01
An SME with a small marketing team wanted to make sense of their Google Search Console and Google Ads data without hiring an SEO specialist. An AI agent now surfaces keyword opportunities the site is half-ranking for and drafts brief outlines for articles to write. The team reviews and decides what to publish — the AI clears the analysis, humans keep the editorial call.
- 02
A services firm was losing enquiries in the gap between marketing and billing. We connected the chain — an enquiry is triaged and answered from a first draft, a quote is issued, and the invoice and receipt follow from the same record. Nothing is retyped, and nothing falls through the handover.
Engagements are described by type, sector, and outcome only. No client identification appears on this site.
What you can count on.
The agent does the analysis and the first draft. What gets published, and what it says about you, is decided by a person. That line does not move.
Reporting is assembled from your source data and cites where each figure came from. If the agent cannot source a claim, it says so instead of filling the gap.
It runs on your analytics, ad, and AI accounts. Customer data stays inside systems you control and is handled against PDPA from the first day, not retrofitted later.
Tell us what you're trying to decide. The data you already collect, and the call you keep having to make without it.